Remington Model 1917 Rifle Serial Numbers
Thanks Guys, that's interesting, I presume the barrel will have a serial number on it, under the woodwork maybe? Thinking back I looked at an M1 carbine a while ago and the only serial number was on the receiver, so I guess the Americans aren't quite as thorough as the Brits.
That's an a good point about manufacturer marks on the receiver, some of these guns I have come across seem to have mismatching parts, although I guess this is no surprise if they had a long service life and as it looks like the parts are interchangeable across the 3 makers. I will check the links out.
Apr 16, 2008 I have recently purchased a Remington 'Model of 1917'.30-06. The rifle is odd in the fact that the serial number (6581XX) is higher than Remington's recorded serial #'s accepted by the US Gov't. It also does not have the smudge pot/bursting bomb on the top of the receiver.
The serialed bolts were never done by US forces, if your gun has one it was done WW2 era or later, by a country that got lend lease guns. Parts interchangability between the three makers was a huge deal and major delay, but they eventually got it right.
For more reading, I would suggest C S Ferris, US Rifle, Model of 1917, which is cheap, available, and very comprehensive. For a grander picture Allied Rifle Contracts by Luke Mercaldo details all Great War era rifle contracts in the US for Europe, and is to my mind one of the best books I have read on the subject. Both books are readily available, and unlike many, extraordinarily reasonable in price. Thanks 4th Gordons, these rifles don't seem to have been as well documented as SMLE'S and not that many people know about them. I guess in Britain certainly the SMLE played a bigger part, and I suppose the m1917's were also useful in ww2 with the Home Guard (Although that is going off on a tangent) and as this is a WW1 forum.
In the UK, the M1917 played NO part in the Great War at all. They were only used by the UK in WWII. The Stratton book on the P14/M1917. Although a little dated, is a very good start on that group of rifles. Jimmy I hope the following satisfies your curiousity.
No serial numbers anywhere except the receiver ring. As mentioned above, eagle stamps on small parts.
Click on the button below to nominate Warriors, The (USA) (En,Fr,De,Es,It) for Retro Game of the Day. Nominate for Retro Game of the Day! Thank you for your nomination. Ps2 iso emulator for pc.
All parts marked with R E or W. Usually a mix, after all these years. Barrels marked with month-year date, and manufacturer letter. HS or JA with no date is WW2 replacement. All this and more, including serial data can be found in the books I reccommended. They are excellent rifles, and a pleasure to shoot, but the complicated story behind their existence makes them even more appealing, and summaries do not do justice to the details. I actually recently lent my copy of Ferris to a coworker who picked up a 1917.
Here are an extra 3000 words. The M1917 was produced in far larger numbers than the M1903 Springfield (during the Great War) and armed a larger number of the AEF by most accounts. They were indeed used for the whole period in which the AEF was in action.
On the WWII use, you should note that Britain also purchased a large number of M1917s prior to the the existence of the lend-lease program (so they were not all lend-lease by any means). As noted above the M1917 is interesting in lots of ways - and arguably it was one of the very few (I might argue ONLY) twentieth century designed rifle used in the war. Most of the other rifles date to the late 19th. The 1903 Springfield and the 1907 SMLE MkIII but the development of these started earlier. The P13/P14/M1917 was modern in a number of ways (the proposed calibre of the P13, the design that made mass production easier (certainly than the 1903 Springfield), the incorporation of a peep ('ring') battle sight zeroed at 300yds.all very modern in many respects.